A Summary on National Status

To help you understand the concepts surrounding the national status, let me start with a question.

The concept of national status is unbelievably simple. When you see how simple this is, you'll freak out because it seems so complex. They've made it complex so that we can't figure it out. When it all boils down, it's really simple. Do you remember the Jim Crow laws? You've heard about them, haven't you?

Well, what really happened was that there were former Black slaves in the South. It wasn't exclusively written for them, but they were using them as an excuse. It certainly was the predominant number involved. However, it was the people in DC and the territories before the Civil War who were stateless. They didn't have any kind of state. There was no federal government to oversee them and give them rights and privileges. There were only the old original state citizens for the first ninety years of the country. After the Civil War and the passing of the fourteenth amendment, the Jim Crow laws came into effect.

But you see, the Jim Crow laws were not a black and white issue. They were certainly personified as such. Almost everything everybody has ever read or been taught about the Civil War or anything else will say that it was. But the Jim Crow laws were really a political statement because the people in the states associated with the Jim Crow laws were the state citizens who still had God-given rights, owed God their duties, and had total constitutional protections. Based on the racial mix of the country at the time before the Civil War, the state citizens were, for the most part, white. The new federal citizens, created by the Fourteenth Amendment, were mainly black former slaves who gained civil rights under the Fourteenth Amendment. This inherent racial discrepancy between the original Fourteenth Amendment citizen and the historical state citizen created the basic thought that the Civil War was specifically about eliminating slavery. In reality, it was to establish a new federal citizenship that was designed to entrap the former black slaves into another form of slavery and eventually entrap all Americans into this slavery in the future.

The Fourteenth Amendment gave former black slaves, as well as those in D.C. and the territories, lowercase civil rights from the government, and they owe the federal government their duty. That's where they got their personhood. So, that's what Jim Crow was. Really, it was a political difference, not a color difference. Simultaneously, underneath the Fourteenth Amendment's federal citizenship was the feudal system. Just remember, the people behind the creation of the new federal citizenship, even today, don't think like we do. This is how they think: "We want to enslave all the people. So, what we'll do is we'll take the black man and put him in a halfway position where he thinks he's free, but underneath it, that position is the feudal system."

Their intention is to eventually trick everyone into a condition of servitude through fourteenth amendment citizenship, and that's exactly what they did. On March 9th, 1933, during the government bankruptcy, they managed to make the entire population, who were federal, fourteenth amendment citizens, sureties for this bankruptcy. It was essentially a bond bankruptcy. They used the fourteenth amendment citizen as collateral for the debt, leveraging their future productivity. Underneath it all lies a feudal system where they have property rights in these federal citizens. They simply took them all and made them sureties for the debt. Essentially, the newly created birth certificates were used as warehouse receipts. The birth certificate signifies the status and is monetized and attached to federal bonds for trading in the bond market. This forms the foundation of our current monetary system that utilizes legal tender or debt notes for commerce. So that's what happened in 1933 and has continued to this day.

The feudal system and associated voluntary servitude affect us today because it can be extrapolated from the 13th Amendment, which does not mention voluntary servitude and thus is legal by omission. Accepting the 14th Amendment servitude has to be voluntary, except at birth, where it is presumed until an individual voluntarily accepts it when they eventually will answer yes to the two questions: Are you a citizen, and are you a resident? There are actually two places in the Constitution where voluntary servitude is totally 100% lawful and legal, and that is what they're using here. So, in the feudal system, which you didn't know you were in, people in voluntary servitude have allegiance to the lord of the manor, or in the situation of a 14th Amendment citizen, the U.S. federal government is the lord of the manor and has a property right in you. Subsequently, when two 14th Amendment federal citizens have children and are under the servitude of the U.S. federal government via the feudal systems, their children are born into this same condition.

This process has been passed down through generations since 1933. When the children grow up, they agree to and confirm their servitude to the lord of the manor, the U.S. federal government, every time they answer in the affirmative to the two questions asked: "Are you a citizen of the United States?" and "Are you a resident?"

Here is the exciting part of this: individuals were put into the condition of servitude at birth without their permission. It was due in part to the discretion and pre-condition of servitude of their parents based on the auspices of the 14th Amendment. Considering this, being born into this condition per the 14th Amendment without your permission could be considered involuntary servitude that is outlawed by the 13th Amendment and thus based on fraud.

To summarize, it may be difficult and require a change in mindset to understand that U.S. citizenship is different from American citizenship. U.S. citizenship is seen as a form of servitude based on the concept of feudalism. We have been conditioned to believe that U.S. citizenship is the ultimate form of patriotism. However, I argue that American citizenship (national status) is the highest level of patriotism. A "national" is not obligated to adhere to licenses, permits, or permissions and is governed by God's laws, not man-made privileges.

Because it was fraud and was confirmed voluntarily, this condition of servitude can be rebutted, and an individual can easily remove themselves from this condition with a simple affidavit to the U.S. Secretary of State. If getting into this condition is initially based on fraud and then is voluntarily affirmed, then individuals can remove themselves voluntarily. If the federal government prevents an individual from voluntarily removing oneself from doing so, it is tyranny. All it takes is a one-page, 2-sentence affidavit to the U.S. Secretary of State to take back your true freedom, not the perceived freedom of U.S. citizenship. It’s all up to you.